• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home Business Economy

The People v Leeds Bradford Airport – the conflict continues

Despite losing an appeal at a public inquiry earlier this year over night flights, Leeds Bradford Airport appears to have come out on top, at least for now

Nick Hodgkinson by Nick Hodgkinson
01-10-2025 07:15 - Updated on 19-04-2026 22:47
in Economy, Region
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
anti airport expansion protesters outside the Royal Court of Justice

Image courtesy by GALBA

Share on Bluesky

The Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA) has successfully opposed Leeds Bradford Airport’s (LBA) expansion plans since 2020. But the airport keeps on finding new ways to try and increase its passenger numbers to seven million by 2030 and ten million by 2045, disregarding the repeated advice from the Climate Change Commission to stop expanding airports.

LBA wants the local night flight rules to be reinterpreted

Under local planning conditions, there is a limit on the number of planes allowed to land and take off at night from LBA. Readers may remember that last year, the airport applied to Leeds City Council seeking a reinterpretation of the meaning of those rules. The airport’s aim was to exempt a certain type of plane (known as QC0.25) from the limit on nighttime flying, allowing these planes to fly without any limit on their numbers between 11pm and 7am.

With the help of GALBA, the council rejected all three of the airport’s certificates of lawful existing use or development – known as CLEUDs. However, LBA then appealed against the council’s decisions, opening a public inquiry in Leeds in March of this year.

In July, the planning inspector who chaired the inquiry announced that he had rejected the two most important of LBA’s CLEUDs and only partially allowed the third. So, how is LBA still flying its QC0.25 planes without them being counted towards the night flight limit? To understand this, we must join Alice in Wonderland for a moment, where it gets curiouser and curiouser.

LBA’s unusual claims

At the public inquiry, LBA made some apparently contradictory claims. They claimed that the local night flight rules made it unlawful for them to fly QC0.25 planes at night at all. Yet, they also argued that these planes had been flying continuously for ten years, meaning the rules no longer applied, therefore they were allowed carry out unlimited night flights without these planes being counted towards the limit on nighttime flying.

This argument can be difficult to understand, but it is used in other areas of law. For example, if a public footpath isn’t used for a long time, a landowner can apply to the council to end its designation as a public right of way.

Doctors on strike outside Airedale Hospital
Health

GMB strike at Airedale Hospital for equal treatment

by Barry White
29 September 2025

The results of the inquiry

The problem for the airport is that the planning inspector agreed that the local rules mean QC0.25 planes are not allowed to fly at night at all. He did not agree however that LBA had broken the rules for ten continuous years. The result is that LBA cannot lawfully fly QC0.25 planes at night at all. This is bad news for LBA, at least you would think so.

However, at present Leeds City Council has decided that because QC0.25 planes cannot lawfully fly at night, they also cannot be counted towards the limit on the number of planes allowed to fly at night. Therefore LBA is flying as many QC0.25 planes at night as it desires, and the council isn’t counting them towards the cap on night flights – exactly what LBA wanted in the first place.

Real-world consequences of airport expansion

Another result of the council’s decision is that thousands of people who live under the flight path are having their health damaged and their air polluted. In LBA’s last planning application, they accepted that: “Environmental noise … has been linked to a range of non-auditory health effects including annoyance, sleep disturbance, cardiovascular disease, impairment of cognitive performance in children, higher BP, hypertension or the prescription of antihypertensives, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, neuronal disorders and cardiometabolic disease.” Noise, especially at night, isn’t just ‘a bit of an inconvenience’ – it’s a serious public health issue.

In addition, LBA’s unlawful nighttime flying means that even more greenhouse gas emissions are being pumped out into the atmosphere, harming the climate we all depend on, when we should be trying to reduce emissions as much and as fast as possible. By the way, if you’ve heard the aviation industry talk about so-called ‘sustainable’ aviation fuels sorting out their emissions problem, don’t just accept it. I urge you to take 30 minutes to listen to this well-informed and well-balanced Radio Four programme, Rethink, to find out the facts.

A workable solution

So, what is the way forward? There’s a clause in the local night flight planning conditions that gives Leeds City Council the power to make it lawful for QC0.25 planes to fly at night. They don’t have to wait for an application by LBA; they can just do it. GALBA has asked the council to use that power as quickly as possible.

It may seem odd that GALBA wants the council to allow QC0.25 planes to fly at night; but here’s the thing – once they’re lawfully allowed to fly, they must also be counted towards the limit on night flights. If or when LBA exceeds that limit, as they have every year since 2022, the council can say STOP! Of course, the council would have to choose to take enforcement action against LBA but this time they would be doing so in the full knowledge that a public inquiry has clarified the meaning of the night flight rules.

To be clear, GALBA is not calling for the airport to close down, we just don’t want it to expand. That’s because of the damage that expansion would do to local people’s health, the air we breathe and the future of our children and their children on the only planet we have. Stay tuned for more updates and, who knows, maybe another trip into Wonderland.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: BradfordLeeds

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Nick Hodgkinson

Nick Hodgkinson

Nick is a committee member of the Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA). He worked as a welfare rights advocate around Yorkshire for 30 years before Motor Neurone Disease forced him to retire. He now spends his time climate campaigning, watching live music and supporting Aston Villa.

Related Posts

A cabin nestled amidst snow-covered fir trees on a mountain clearing in the winter. Aurora borealis. Northern lights in winter forest. Christmas holiday and winter vacations concept
Culture

From cultural revival to devolution: can Yorkshire follow Finland’s lead?

by Colin Speakman
5 September 2026
Metabolic Rifts by Ian Angus pictured against a landscape of green countryside and an industrial complex with smoking chimneys.
Economy

A review of ‘Metabolic Rifts: Capitalism’s Assault on the Earth System’

by Bryn Glover
1 September 2026
York River Ouse riverside waterfront.
Region

York councillors urged to scrutinise Yorkshire Water over sewage pollution

by Kay Johnstone
29 August 2026
BEVERLEY, UK - DECEMBER 17, 2023: Night time view of ancient minster from elevated point in town centre with flood lights on December 17, 2023 in Beverley, Yorkshire, UK.
Region

The Percys in Yorkshire: power, rebellion, ruin and revival

by Ian Richardson
26 August 2026
Euston Road, London, March 2026. Image shows a tent encampment in front of an office block showing the stark contrast between poverty and affluence
Economy

Economic growth: are we measuring what really matters?

by John Cole
15 August 2026
Next Post
Ripon Town Hall

Ripon City Council’s bitter divisions widen, as public anger mounts

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720