• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home News Environment

Will the moratorium on incinerator plants in England go far enough?

The ministerial direction issued last week is a temporary stay, but a longer term decision on incinerator plants is needed

John Grogan by John Grogan
11-04-2024 17:01 - Updated on 14-04-2024 17:52
in Environment, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
incinerator plants

Image by Neil Theasby via geograph.org.uk, licensed by CC BY-SA 2.0

Share on Bluesky

Last Friday at 5.30pm, just as offices were closing for the weekend, the government temporarily banned permits for new incinerator plants in England until 24 May.

The ban includes the plant that Environment Secretary Steve Barclay is fighting to stop being built in his constituency at Wisbech in North East Cambridgeshire. He has been forced to step aside from involvement in the issue and has left the decision to his junior minister who imposed the ban by writing to the Environment Agency (EA). The EA is responsible for issuing the environmental permits.

The truth, however, is that this decision should have been made a long time ago. For years, local campaigners across the country have been campaigning for a moratorium on new incineration arguing that there is an excess of capacity and that recycling is being adversely impacted.

Devolved governments’ successes

The Labour-led government in Wales declared a moratorium more than three years ago, in March 2021, and the policy has been a great success. Recycling rates have climbed to 66%, compared with only 42% across the border in England. Scotland quickly followed suit introducing a similar measure – in their case issuing revised planning guidance with a presumption against new incineration.

Recycling has the added advantage of creating far more jobs than incineration. So whatever the political considerations which may have been involved in the timing of the temporary ban, the UK Without Incineration Network (UKWIN), which advises many local campaign groups, is keen now to press for a long-term moratorium in England.

At last, with a general election looming and incineration being a key issue in many local constituencies, the campaign has the attention of ministers. There may well be divisions in the cabinet, given that the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero granted permission for the Wisbech project, but the tide does seems to be turning.

Proposed incinerator plants now on hold

In Yorkshire and the Humber alone, there are at least ten proposals currently being considered that would involve new incinerators. To proceed they need both planning permission and an environmental permit and the projects are at various stages of the process. Many would be stopped in their tracks if a moratorium is maintained. The proposed sites are:

  • 145,000 tonnes proposed for land off Houghton Main Colliery Roundabout, Park Spring Road, Little Houghton, Barnsley.
  • 320,000 tonnes proposed for Newfields Industrial Estate, near Hull Docks.
  • 48,000 tonnes proposed for Saltend Chemicals Park, Saltend Lane, Hull.
  • 700,000 tonnes proposed for North Beck Energy Centre, Queens Road, Immingham.
  • 780,000 tonnes proposed for South Humber Bank Energy Centre, South Humber Bank Power Station, South Marsh Road, Stallingborough, Grimsby.
  • 226,000 tonnes proposed for Alpha Grimsby Renewable Energy Centre, Vireol Plc, Energy Park Way, Grimsby.
  • 760,000 tonnes proposed for North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park, Flixborough Wharf, Flixborough Industrial Estate. This proposal is due to be considered for planning permission on 15 May.
  • 125,000 tonnes proposed for Knapton Green Energy Facility, Landfill Site Knapton Quarry, East Knapton, Malton.
  • 350,000 tonnes proposed for Southmoor Energy Centre, Kellingley Colliery, Weeland Road (near Knottingley).
  • 132,000 tonnes proposed for Kingspan Insulation Ltd, Enterprise Way, Sherburn In Elmet, Selby.
Carbon credit concept. Tradable certificate to drive industrial process in the direction of low emissions. CO2 pollution regulation. CO2 and US dollars icon in green crystal glass ball on nature view.
Environment

Will ‘carbon counting’ our trees save the world?

by Charlie Clutterbuck
4 April 2024 - Updated on 10 April 2024

Government targets negate need for new incinerator plants

There is no economic or environmental need for any of these proposed incinerators. The government has set out waste reduction and recycling targets for the decades ahead. At present, the EA is not allowed to refuse permits just because they go against those targets. These targets include:

  • Halving residual waste per capita by 2042 relative to a 2019 base year.
  • Interim residual waste reduction targets are set out in the Environmental Improvement Plan 2023.
  • Target of 65% recycling as set out in Resources and Waste Strategy 2018 and the Waste Management Plan for England 2021.

The government’s plan is to reduce the amount of waste going into landfill or incineration and increase that being recycled or reused. Under this plan, incinerator feedstock will fall to around 16.4 million tonnes by 2027, and then to around 11.7 million tonnes by 2042. With around 19 million tonnes of incineration capacity currently operational or under construction across England, this can be expected to exceed available feedstock by 2.6 million tonnes in 2027 and then 7.4 million tonnes by 2042.

Exacerbation of climate change

It should also be remembered that incineration exacerbates climate change, which is why the Climate Change Committee called for a moratorium back in June 2023. Incineration results in high levels of greenhouse gas emissions. For every tonne of waste burned, typically around one tonne of CO₂ is released into the atmosphere, and around half of this is fossil CO₂. This means that incineration has a higher carbon intensity than the conventional use of fossil fuels, and significantly higher than what most people would consider ‘low carbon’. Further background on these figures can be found from the International Panel on Climate Change.

Of course, some local councils have long-term contracts with companies operating incinerators. A moratorium on new incineration capacity in England would not impact these adversely. If anything they would face less competition to secure the residual waste that, for the foreseeable future, will not be able to be reused, recycled or composted.

While it is true that new incinerators are more likely than old ones to have higher electrical efficiency, some of the oldest running plants such as Eastcroft, SELCHP and Sheffield are connected to district heating schemes which means that less of the energy generated is wasted. The new facility currently under construction Edmonton is intended to replace the existing plant, which is why UKWIN ‘s calculations only cover the additional capacity the new plant would bring, rather than the full capacity of the plant.

Temporary ban will hopefully be extended

So what happens next? Most likely the government will extend the temporary ban on new permits in the coming weeks. Hopefully, they will announce a consultation on the introduction of a long-term moratorium on new incineration capacity. This will give campaigners the opportunity to point out that the EA should, in addition to a ban on new projects, revoke existing permits for incinerators which have not yet been built, such as that proposed at Keighley.

In addition, plans for small incinerators (such as that suggested in Sowerby Bridge), which by virtue of their size are regulated by local councils and not the EA, should also be brought within the scope of the ban. When it comes to incineration, at last the times they are a changing.


John Grogan is a volunteer adviser to the UK Without Incineration Network.

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

John Grogan

John Grogan

John is co-chair of One Yorkshire. He was born in Halifax and served as Labour MP for Keighley from 2017 to 2019, and for Selby from 1997 to 2010.

Related Posts

One Health Congress in Lisbon
Environment

The Champions of Life have to take on the Broligarchs

by Natalie Bennett
14 September 2026
Drone photograph showing the very low water levels in Scar House Reservoir during the 2025 heatwave and drought. Months of below average rainfall have left the reservoirs looking very dry
Environment

Will there be enough water to satisfy demand in 2050? Part two

by Patrick Wright
9 September 2026
Aerial view of a dramatically low Woodhead Reservoir during drought conditions, The reservoir, part of a system supplying drinking water to Greater Manchester, lies in North Derbyshire, June 2025
Environment

Will there be enough water to satisfy demand in 2050? Part one

by Patrick Wright
8 September 2026 - Updated on 9 September 2026
Yorkshire Water: Dirty Business panel. The panel includes Prof Becky Malby, Peter Hammond, Rob Forrester, Cliff Roney, Tracy Brabin, Oliver Coppard and was hosted by channel 4 writer and producer Joe Bullman of docu-drama Dirty Business.
Environment

Yorkshire’s dirty business: will the region’s mayors hold polluters to account?

by Kirsty Tucker
3 September 2026
31/07/2026. Sheffield, United Kingdom. Prime Minister Andy Burnham visits The Meadow Family Centre in Sheffield. Picture by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street
Education

Beyond childcare: a new vision for early childhood

by Dr Aaron Bradbury
27 August 2026
Next Post
Image shows a poster that says 'PROTECT TRANS KIDS'

The Cass review: trans care or trans scare?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720