• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home News Brexit

Brexit border checks: better never than late?

David Davis once rejected the idea of any transition period as Britain is expected to announce a further delay in Brexit border checks

Anthony Robinson by Anthony Robinson
27-04-2022 11:56
in Brexit, Business
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Port of Dover, Eastern Docks, Customs Control

Port of Dover, Eastern Docks, Customs Control by Helmut Zozmann is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Share on Bluesky

It seems the government is edging towards a further delay in implementing customs procedures and SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) checks on goods arriving from the EU. This has apparently been ‘all but confirmed’ by Boris Johnson himself during his visit to India, according to The Independent. It would be the fourth time the date has been put back.

The delay is being actively considered to avoid a ‘collapse’ of supply chains already under severe pressure due to delays at Dover and as a major new report shows imports from the EU fell 25 percent last year, even before new post-brexit checks come into force.

Those with long memories might recall David Davis – surely now a man beyond parody – saying in November 2016 that he was “not really interested” in a transition period to smooth Britain’s exit from the EU and thought getting the customs infrastructure in place during the two year period provided for negotiation was “doable”.

Brexit border checks: better never than late?

In a fit of magnanimity, Davis, a former SAS reservist apparently told members of the City of London Corporation that he was prepared to accept a transition period “to be kind to the EU”.

In July 2017, he admitted to a House of Lords select committee that a transition period may be needed, not because he thought we wouldn’t be ready, but because the EU wouldn’t be able to meet the 29 March 2019 date set for Britain’s departure:

“It will be quite tough to get customs in the right place in two years but it’s doable with a bit of money, but to get the French customs in the same place in two years or the Belgian or the Dutch customs I think will be a different issue, that’s why a transition period [is needed].”

This was when Theresa May’s government was pushing to get the withdrawal agreement and a trade deal all done and dusted in two years. In other words, Davis actually thought Britain would be ready by March 2019 (and famously with no downsides) while the EU would struggle.

The EU was ready at the end of 2020

In fact, the sclerotic EU easily had everything in place by the end of 2020; all necessary border staff recruited, systems in place, fully tested and ready to go. Now here we are, over a year later, and the UK is preparing to announce a further delay.

Worse, the delay being contemplated is apparently the longest yet, nine months by all accounts with SPS checks perhaps being deferred for three years until 2025. Interestingly, both Jacob Rees-Mogg, minister for Brexit opportunities and government efficiency, and Lord Frost, former chief negotiator, are arguing for Britain to forego checks permanently, an idea floated by the influential pro-brexit think tank, the Institute of Economic Affairs in February.

Brexit border checks are obviously better never than late.

Chaos in Kent
Brexit

Travel chaos in Kent: Brexit related or not?

by Anthony Robinson
12 April 2022 - Updated on 8 September 2025

There is no ‘master plan’

Let us be clear, this is not part of some master plan. They are literally making it up as they go along. Michael Gove has previously defended spending £705m on the expansion of our customs sector and in February, the MP for east Kent, Natalie Elphicke, was adamant the 650 new jobs being created in her constituency for border officials was a good thing.

But if they aren’t going to be used, what was the point?

I think we now know both Davis and Gove were totally clueless about the implications of the flagship policy of their own party, a policy advocated, supported and campaigned for by them and for which both have held senior ministerial posts. It’s hard to understand how anyone could be that stupid, but there we are.

Not only did Davis totally overestimate Britain’s capacity to prepare itself to exit the bloc, he also underestimated the EU’s ability to plan ahead and invest in infrastructure and staff for the border control posts in the EU member states he casually dismissed back in 2017.

At one point in 2018, when the Irish border had finally been recognised as a big issue, Britain was proposing ‘maximum facilitation’, a system of entirely novel ‘light-touch’ border controls not yet invented or used anywhere else in the world. It transpires after four years we can’t actually introduce any sort of border controls – even perfectly standard ones like everyone else – on goods imports from the EU.

Imagine if you can, that when the EU published its negotiating guidelines in April 2017 it had included a proposal to force the UK into inferior third country status in the single market while EU exporters enjoyed permanent barrier free access to Britain. There would have been absolute fury in the Brexit-supporting press at the sheer effrontery of the Commission. Yet we are now doing it voluntarily.

UK to follow CE standards

The latest wheeze is the proposal to carry on permanently accepting the EU’s CE mark instead of demanding EU manufacturers comply with our UKCA standards. This is another handicap for British companies who will now face double the costs of certifying products to meet both EU and UK regulations while EU manufacturers are unaffected.

The Daily Express hails this as a, “Brexit master stroke” in what must be the one of the most surreal headlines ever published, even by their standards. The whole point of Brexit was to give British industry a competitive advantage but now we want to throw open the doors to cheap goods of any and every type with no checks whatsoever, while burdening our manufacturers with needless extra barriers on exports to our main overseas market.

Last month the EU published a review of how the trade and cooperation agreement is bedding down after a year in operation. Noting the customs and SPS checks that Britain now appears to be delaying once again, it said

“Their application may be challenging for EU exporters and Member States due to the logistical impact of the new procedures, in particular the need to submit required declarations and supporting documents before goods are shipped from EU ports to the United Kingdom, as well as the complexity of the IT system put in place by the United Kingdom.”

Our IT systems may be over-complex but EU exporters need have no worries, we may never implement them at all.

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Anthony Robinson

Anthony Robinson

Anthony is a retired sales engineer, living in North Yorkshire. He has represented several European manufacturers of packaging machinery in the UK. Anthony is interested in politics, although not as an active member of any party, and enjoys reading, gardening and DIY. Follow him on Bluesky

Related Posts

Metabolic Rifts by Ian Angus pictured against a landscape of green countryside and an industrial complex with smoking chimneys.
Economy

A review of ‘Metabolic Rifts: Capitalism’s Assault on the Earth System’

by Bryn Glover
1 September 2026
Euston Road, London, March 2026. Image shows a tent encampment in front of an office block showing the stark contrast between poverty and affluence
Economy

Economic growth: are we measuring what really matters?

by John Cole
15 August 2026
farmland
Economy

Building towards insanity: are we sacrificing food security for housing?

by Patrick Wright
15 August 2026 - Updated on 17 August 2026
Various cheese with different Europe flags
Trade

Travesty of language – the hollowing-out of the most-favoured nation clause

by John A Clarke
11 August 2026
Chain on a mobile phone with social networking icons on it.
Science and Technology

Regulating the symptom, ignoring the cause

by Paul Rowlston
7 August 2026
Next Post
Photo by Chayene Rafaela on Unsplash

The NHS Race and Health Observatory review on ethnic inequalities in healthcare

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720