• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home Region

As a key worker, I would support a return to lockdown in Sheffield

I’ve been working 40+ hours a week in a supermarket throughout the pandemic and from what I’ve seen, I’m not at all surprised that Covid-19 is still prevalent in Sheffield

Louisa Merrick-WhitebyLouisa Merrick-White
14-07-2020 12:43 - Updated On 28-08-2024 21:53
in Region
Reading Time: 5 mins
A A
Sheffield City Hall and Peace Gardens Photo: Adam lebaigue, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, SONY DSC

Sheffield City Hall and Peace Gardens Photo: Adam lebaigue, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, SONY DSC

31
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Over the weekend, a list of the top 20 local authorities most at risk of a resurgence of Coronavirus was released, upon which Sheffield ranked 15th, with neighbouring Rotherham and Barnsley also making the list. The data showed that in the seven days from the 28 June to the 4 July, Sheffield reported three community outbreaks and 2.5 incidences per 100,000 people. This is a decrease from the previous week, but still places Sheffield in the ‘danger zone’.

Sheffield has also been identified as one of three areas that will require ‘enhanced support’, although it is unclear exactly what that would entail. For a city of its size, Sheffield has generally not fared too badly, with fewer than 300 deaths recorded in Sheffield hospitals by the end of June. Of course this figure doesn’t account for deaths in the community or in care homes, but for a city with a population of over half a million people, it could definitely be a lot worse.

I’ve been working 40+ hours a week in a supermarket throughout the pandemic and from what I’ve seen, I’m not at all surprised that Covid-19 is still prevalent in Sheffield. While guidelines were never being followed particularly well, since lockdown was eased any concern for preventing the spread of coronavirus has all but gone. A wise man once said, “give them an inch and they’ll take a mile”, and from what I’ve seen, that couldn’t be more true.

Social distancing was barely adhered to at the height of the pandemic so naturally that’s been the first thing to go. The only place I see social distancing now is in the queue for the checkouts where there are markers to stand on, but elsewhere in the shop, self-regulated social distancing is non-existent. I regularly get people reaching over me while I’m filling the shelves or walking past me as though I’m not a person who could catch this but just part of the furniture. It’s as if saying “can I just squeeze past?” as you walk within inches of me makes it okay.

There’s also been a marked decline in people’s attempts at social distancing following the opening of the pubs, which is a surprise to absolutely no one except the government. Drunk people stumbling in to the shop from the pub ten minutes before closing are not socially distancing – not from the mates they’re with, not from other customers and not from staff. Frankly it’s infuriating.


More articles from Yorkshire Bylines:

  • York MP involved in deceptive amendment that will deregulate gene-edited crops without scrutiny
  • Lockdown community spirit soars in Ackworth
  • Pen-y-ghent: time to plan a Yorkshire day out

There’s a small group of people who seem to actively resist the measures put in place. They disregard the one-way systems and even refuse to use the tills with screens in front of them, instead leaning around them as if the screens are there to indicate the till shouldn’t be used when in fact it’s quite the opposite. I had one woman refuse to stand in front of the screen because she could see little droplets of someone’s spit on it and would not be reasoned with regarding how that proved the necessity of the screens.

With lockdown easing we’re also seeing an increase in the number of people getting into confrontations. Many of these clashes are between those who still want to stay safe and maintain social distancing measures, and those who charge into shops, go wherever they like and when challenged, exclaim “I don’t give a f**k about social distancing”. By all means, continue to put yourself in danger but don’t take the rest of us down with you!

By far the most concerning thing I’ve come across is some people’s attitude to the pandemic itself. The most common and problematic attitude I’ve seen is the belief that “if I get it I get it, it can’t be helped”, a sentiment I’ve heard echoed many times by people who continue to ignore everything that could possibly help. Then of course there are the “Covid-deniers”, those who believe the conspiracy theories, or worse, believe that the virus doesn’t exist at all, therefore they will do nothing to change their behaviour in order to mitigate the effects of a very real threat that they don’t believe exists.

Finally, there are the ignorant people, the uninformed; those who don’t regularly engage with news or current affairs and just turn up to the supermarket wondering why there’s a queue the length of the car park and nothing on the shelves. When the screens went up in front of our tills, one such individual remarked something along the lines of “oh, it’s getting serious then?” Only then did I realise the true extent to which people can fail to engage with the world around them and subsequently remain woefully uninformed.

With all this in mind, I would wholeheartedly support another lockdown of Sheffield, as it seems that’s what’s necessary to make people realise the severity of the problem. Apparently a nationwide death toll of nearly 45,000 people (with over 60,000 excess deaths) isn’t enough. Those who have been taking it seriously would understand. And for those who made a second, localised lockdown necessary, it would serve them right to lose the privileges with which they’d been so erroneously entrusted.

Tags: Covid-19
Previous Post

Gove’s new border plan: the longest suicide note in history?

Next Post

Smash ‘n grab apps

Louisa Merrick-White

Louisa Merrick-White

Louisa is a freelance writer and editor from Sheffield. After graduating from the University of Sheffield she rediscovered her passion for writing and has since written for Metro, Huffpost and the Independent. Louisa is also an Assistant Editor for the Bylines Network and enjoys writing on her blog when she can find the time!

Related Posts

Ripon cathedral in the snow
News

Calls for Ripon Cathedral to face safeguarding review

byBrian McHugh
12 January 2025 - Updated On 14 January 2025
The front page of Leeds Other Paper 8 March 1985
Region

Leeds Other Paper – a radical alternative to the mainstream?

byJosephine Ingram
10 January 2025
Otley Bridge over the River Wharfe, showing the connected footbridge, with a swan in the foreground
Opinion

A bridge too farcical

byDavid Robson
5 January 2025 - Updated On 6 January 2025
Otley Tittybottle oak in the summer by the river
Environment

Campaign to save the Otley Tittybottle oak and tulip trees

bySarah Mumford
3 January 2025 - Updated On 4 January 2025
Angela Rayner and the metropolitan mayors
Home Affairs

Why federalism, not timid devolution, is key to England’s future

byOlli Watkins
28 December 2024 - Updated On 5 January 2025
Next Post
facebook application icon

Smash ‘n grab apps

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Boris Johnson Brexit Freedoms Bill Budget Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Dominic Cummings Equality Farming Fishing Freedom of Movement Freeports Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Lessons of Brexit Liz Truss Media Mental Health Monarchy NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty PPE Refugees and Asylum Seekers Refugee Week REUL Rishi Sunak Ten for Nature Theatre Trans Travel Ukraine
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2024 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2024 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

Our website only uses cookies to help us record visitor numbers. No third-party cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.