• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home Politics

Obesity strategy: why are politicians obsessed with weight?

The government's obesity strategy is rooted in a culture of 'fatphobia', of which the prime minister is as much a victim as anyone

Alex Toal by Alex Toal
27-07-2021 16:36 - Updated on 10-10-2024 18:22
in Politics, Society
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
“PM Boris Johnson with Rugby League World Cup Leaders. ” by Number 10 is licensed under CC BY 2.0

“PM Boris Johnson with Rugby League World Cup Leaders. ” by Number 10 is licensed under CC BY 2.0

Share on Bluesky

On Sunday, Boris Johnson announced a new plan to counter obesity. The scheme involves the introduction of an app to track family eating habits, rewarding those who reduce their calorie intake and buy more fresh fruit and veg.

This marks the prime minister’s second major intervention on obesity, after a £10m ad campaign that highlighted his own weight and how this had affected him while he had covid. It comes on the back of interventions in 2018 and 2016, and the introduction of the ‘sugar tax’.

Indeed, the governments of the past five years have done more to reduce obesity than they have to tackle homelessness or fix social care.

To be fair on these administrations, there are public health consequences of obesity. Those with a high BMI (body mass index) are, for example, likely to suffer from cancer and hospitalisation, while their life expectancy is reduced.

Cultural depictions of obesity in Britain

However, public discourse around obesity is highly problematic and fails to address the root causes of why people are gaining weight.

Britain has long been culturally ‘fatphobic’. Body image standards have consistently correlated the thin with the beautiful since the 19th century. At the same time, stoicism was inculcated as central to British culture, and in opposition to gluttony, as an example of lack of self-control.

This made fatness coterminous with both physical and moral repulsiveness, and gluttony became a central sin for characters in popular cultures, from Homer Simpson to Augustus Gloop, not to mention Austin Powers’ ‘Fat Bastard’.

Obesity, politics, and the prime minister

Indeed, this has long been reflected in our political cartoons. Satirists have frequently used the prime minister’s weight as part of their depictions of him, in a way which correlates being overweight with being disgusting.

It is one of the few times that I sympathise with Johnson, who has undeniably been a victim of our fatphobic culture. While I may disagree with much of what he has done, no-one deserves to be shamed because of their weight.

Existing attitudes ignore the fact that genetics are a significant determining factor in obesity, in addition to stress, lack of sleep, and age. Add into this the fact that the validity of BMI as a medical term is being increasingly questioned, and it becomes clear that we are ill equipped as a society to discuss obesity, let alone tackle it.

The public health consequences of the obesity discourse

This discourse also has consequences. Attempts to tackle obesity fall into two main traps. They either label the condition an “epidemic” (as the WHO does), something which people catch randomly. Or they focus on obesity as a personal choice, trying to tackle it with ad campaigns, sin taxes, or incentive schemes.

These approaches fail to recognise the reasons for obesity. The correlation of poverty with weight gain is long-documented. Those who are food-insecure are less likely to have the time or equipment to put together a healthy balanced diet, and more likely to resort to high sugar and high-fat alternatives, which are often easier and cheaper to prepare.

The austerity factor

In the UK, food insecurity has been directly linked with austerity in multiple studies. Poverty rates for children and pensioners have increased since 2010. Prior to the pandemic, one in 12 households, and almost half of households on universal credit, had low levels of food security.

Moreover, being active has become more difficult. Due to cuts in local government funding, hundreds of parks and football pitches have been closed, while physical education programmes in schools have also been reduced.

The conversation about obesity is a difficult one to have. Fundamentally, everyone should have the right to do what they want with their bodies, whether that involves gaining or losing weight. However, our current economic and societal constructs push the most vulnerable towards obesity, while depicting them as physically repulsive and a strain on the public sector. To truly make Britain a healthier place, public discourse needs to recognise the causes of obesity, and work to removing the stigma of the condition that is, for many, no fault of their own.  

Tags: Boris Johnson

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Alex Toal

Alex Toal

A graduate of the University of York and Balliol College, Oxford, Alex is a passionate devolutionist, and an active campaigner to solve the housing crisis.

Related Posts

One Health Congress in Lisbon
Environment

The Champions of Life have to take on the Broligarchs

by Natalie Bennett
14 September 2026
Cricket player batsman hitting a ball with a bat shot from below with cricket stadium ground background
Opinion

How has Hawk-Eye changed the game of cricket?

by Dr John Elsom
10 September 2026
Two wooden Adirondack chairs painted with the Canadian flag sit side by side at the end of a dock, facing out over a calm Muskoka lake in Ontario's cottage country. The red maple leaf stands out crisply against the white painted slats, while long shadows stretch across the warm wood planks. Still, mirror-like water reflects the forested shoreline that frames the lake under a soft blue summer sky. Shot from behind in a rear view, the two empty chairs invite the viewer to sit, relax, and take in the peaceful waterfront scene. With no people in the frame, the image captures the quiet beauty of Canadian cottage life, evoking tranquility, escape, and slow summer days at the lake. This patriotic Canada Day image suits travel and tourism, cottage and real estate marketing, lifestyle content, and summer long weekend campaigns. The flag-painted chairs make it especially well suited to Canada Day, July 1st, and national pride themes, as well as broader ideas of relaxation, leisure, and the idyllic Canadian lakeside lifestyle.
Culture

What Yorkshire looks like after the family tree crosses the Atlantic

by Joshua W J Brown
6 September 2026
A cabin nestled amidst snow-covered fir trees on a mountain clearing in the winter. Aurora borealis. Northern lights in winter forest. Christmas holiday and winter vacations concept
Culture

From cultural revival to devolution: can Yorkshire follow Finland’s lead?

by Colin Speakman
5 September 2026
freshly picked beetroot
Food

Beetroot finds its groove

by Meryl White
3 September 2026
Next Post
York, UK by Robert Sedovšek

North Yorkshire/York unitary authorities: a basic government decision has been taken

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720