• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home Politics

We need a new narrative about what being British really means

Boris Johnson doesn’t get to define what it means to be British; that’s our job. It shouldn't be about flag waving and intolerance

Oliver Coppard by Oliver Coppard
07-04-2021 10:16 - Updated on 27-09-2024 17:32
in Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Bring British

Photo by Ian Taylor from Pexels

Share on Bluesky

“Boris Johnson doesn’t get to define what it means to be British; that’s our job.”

The student strike at a London school has thrown the issue of flags back into the news. Students at Pimlico School chanting “there’s no black in the Union Jack” follows the BBC being questioned about the paucity of flags in its annual report, and the growing prominence of Union Jack in the Zoom backgrounds of Conservative ministers doing media rounds and TV interviews.

Sadly, those Conservative MPs flying the flag in their spare rooms don’t seem to be using it in a civic-minded display of national pride, but as ammunition to fight the UK’s culture war.

The government’s pro-flag enthusiasts will tell you that they’re simply proud to be British. But implicitly, and by contrast, they want to promote the idea that anyone not enthusiastically embracing the Union Jack is failing in their patriotic duty.

We need a new narrative about what being British really means

As far as I can tell the government wants a row about flags for three reasons.

  • With Brexit ‘done’ they want to stoke the embers of those divisions that took over our politics for the last five years and delivered a substantial Tory majority of in 2019.
  • They want to divert attention from their mishandling of covid and their casual approach to political ethics.
  • And they want to sew division within the Labour Party, as the left turns in on itself while deciding whether flags are a necessary corollary to winning elections or a capitulation to right-wing, imperial-age dogma.

The government needs to hide behind a flag, because the government itself is a political project bereft of any new ideas or a coherent governing strategy.

Most governments 11 years into their term in office would be in the weeds of structural reform, dealing with the difficult and gritty problems that simply can’t be ignored after a few years of governing.

By contrast, this government shows no signs of confronting those challenges in any meaningful way. Indeed, it seems intent on creating more problems than it can solve.

The government is masking reality behind a flag

Rather than deal with the realities of a UK cut adrift from its main trading partner, of mental health and old age care services that aren’t fit for purpose, or of the creaking constitutional settlement of the UK, we are asked to see the flag as an emblem or symbol of our success as a country.

The temptation for most people is either to ignore the bait or simply join in the flag waving. But both of those options would pass up the opportunity for us to have a conversation about what it really means to be proudly British in the 21st century.

Despite our post-Brexit isolation and malaise, the UK has a past, culture and future to celebrate and around which to build a renewed national story fit for the 21st century.

This government would rather that story was centred around a militaristic, individualistic, freedom fighting version of Britain, but that’s far from a settled or singular version of our history or our present.

Draping the country in Union Jacks won’t cover the brutality of the new immigration plan

Rachel Trafford 30 March 2021

There are lessons we can learn from Joe Biden

In the recent American election, Joe Biden didn’t let Donald Trump own the American story or define what it meant to be American. He proactively and consistently painted an alternative picture of what America was and could be again, embracing both the complexity and positivity of American identity, from slavery to the space race.

We can do that here too, and develop a new, alternative narrative around what it means to be proudly British.

Rather than question the BBC’s failure to use more than a single Union Jack in its annual report, we should celebrate the world-leading content created by the BBC, and a World Service that provides news to nearly 180 million people across the globe.

We should look back on Britain’s role in creating international bodies

Rather than hark back to World War Two, we should promote the role played by the UK in the formation of the UN, the EU, or the European Convention on Human Rights. Rather than cutting back on international aid, we should welcome the responsibility and influence that comes with being one of the richest countries in the world.

Rather than revelling in our strength we could cherish our kindness, generosity, creativity, and leadership, as well as our athletes, scientists, activists, and artists.

This government would have us believe there is only one way to be British, and it requires flag waving and intolerance. The country I know and love is one with a complex history and place in the world, but one with countless successes and limitless opportunity.

If we’re going to wave the Union Jack, let that flag represent the real country we are, have been and can be again. The country of Wilberforce, Shakespeare, Peterloo, the Kindertransport, Tim-Berners Lee, Damien Hirst and the Premier League. Boris Johnson doesn’t get to define what it means to be British; that’s our job.


Oliver Coppard is the founder of Campaigns Plus, a community level behaviour change consultancy. He was formerly the Labour Party’s parliamentary candidate in Sheffield Hallam in 2015,

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Oliver Coppard

Oliver Coppard

Oliver is the mayor of South Yorkshire. He is founder of Campaigns Plus, a community level behaviour change consultancy. He was formerly the Labour Party's parliamentary candidate in Sheffield Hallam in 2015, and the director of field operations in Yorkshire, the Humber and Lincolnshire for the Remain campaign during the 2016 referendum. He lives and works in Sheffield.

Related Posts

One Health Congress in Lisbon
Environment

The Champions of Life have to take on the Broligarchs

by Natalie Bennett
14 September 2026
31/07/2026. Sheffield, United Kingdom. Prime Minister Andy Burnham visits The Meadow Family Centre in Sheffield. Picture by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street
Education

Beyond childcare: a new vision for early childhood

by Dr Aaron Bradbury
27 August 2026
President Donald Trump receives an update from Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the U.S. peace plan for Gaza in the Oval Office, Friday, October 3, 2025 - USA (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)
Poetry

the slow unbecoming of 47

by Steve Pottinger
23 August 2026
Yorkshire, UK, picture of a map in a world atlas
Politics

Burnham’s moment: why England needs more than second-class devolution

by John Hall
22 August 2026
Main stage of the Labour Party conference in Liverpool in 2024 with a large red sign saying Labour, and other screens showing the Union flag and a sign sayig "Change Begins"
Politics

Can Labour ever settle its internal divisions?

by John Heywood
12 August 2026
Next Post
georgia voting law

Georgia’s Voting Law rings of ‘Jim Crow Laws’

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720