• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home Opinion

No One Above: why we speak, why we build, why we won’t stop

Survivors of Harrods abuse advocate to educate, overcome self-blame, protect future generations and ensure power is held to account

Shanta Sundarason by Shanta Sundarason
06-02-2026 17:04 - Updated on 01-03-2026 16:13
in Opinion
Reading Time: 9 mins read
A A
London department store Harrods morphs into a set of bird cages

Composite image: Guillaume TECHER on Unsplash and Igor Sporynin on Unsplash

Share on Bluesky

No One Above (NOA) is a survivor-led collective built on integrity, compassion, and accountability. We are survivors of exploitation and trafficking connected to Fayed-controlled organisations including Harrods.

For many of us, silence did not just come from fear of consequences. It came from self-blame, confusion, and years of asking ourselves the wrong questions: Was it really that bad? Did I misread it? Did I somehow invite it? Should I have known better?

We did not set out to become advocates. We did not choose to become ‘the women who speak out’. We became this because silence was never neutral in our lives – it was a tool used against us. It kept harm hidden, protected reputations, and left the next person vulnerable.

No One Above (NOA) exists because what happened to us was not random, and it was not inevitable. It was enabled – by power, by institutional cowardice, by systems that treat women’s safety as negotiable especially when the abuser is wealthy, connected, or useful. NOA is survivor-led and built on a simple truth: no one is safe when anyone is above the law.

We do this to educate – because language is a form of protection

Many people still think abuse looks like a stranger in a dark alley, a sudden act of violence, or something unmistakably criminal in the moment. That assumption creates enormous blind spots – especially when exploitation happens slowly, inside workplaces, behind prestige, and through systems that look legitimate from the outside.

For many survivors who contact us, the harm did not arrive with clarity. It arrived disguised as opportunity. A meeting that felt uncomfortable but important. Attention framed as mentorship. Access framed as trust. Silence framed as professionalism.

One of the most damaging myths survivors carry is the belief that if it didn’t look like what we were warned about, it must somehow be our fault. This is how self-blame takes root. Not because survivors are naïve, but because they were never taught what abuse can actually look like when it wears a suit, a title, or a brand name.

Trafficking, for example, is still widely misunderstood as something that only happens across borders, or only in the context of prostitution. In reality, trafficking frameworks focus on act, means, and purpose – recruitment, control, and exploitation – and can occur entirely within one city, one company, one institution. It can look like being hired, promoted, isolated, controlled, and exploited without ever crossing a border.

Education is not academic for us. It is preventative. If people – including survivors themselves – do not have the language to name what they are experiencing, they are far more likely to internalise blame and far less likely to seek help.

That is why NOA invests in clarity: plain language, real-world indicators, and pattern recognition. Grooming. Coercive control. Abuse of power. Institutional silencing. These are not ‘buzzwords’. They are the vocabulary of safeguarding – and without them, harm hides in plain sight.

We do this to create awareness — because harm can thrive in plain sight

A painful reality sits at the heart of our work: harm can be widely known and still go unchallenged when power dictates the rules.

Many survivors did speak – to colleagues, managers, HR departments, friends, even to the authorities. What they encountered was not protection, but minimisation. Disbelief. Delay. Quiet warnings to be careful. Advice to move on. Over time, serious allegations become ‘rumours’, and rumours become background noise.

This is where another myth takes hold: If it were really serious, someone would have stopped it. But institutions do not stop what they benefit from ignoring.

NOA exists to disrupt that cycle. We are building awareness that abuse connected to powerful institutions is not an anomaly or a ‘historic scandal’. It is a present-day safeguarding failure with ongoing consequences – including how survivors are treated when they seek justice, and how easily future victims are exposed when systems refuse to learn.

Awareness also means challenging selective attention. If society only reacts when a story becomes impossible to ignore, then protection becomes dependent on publicity – and countless people fall through the gaps. We are working toward awareness that outlasts headlines: awareness embedded in policy, accountability, and institutional behaviour.

We do this to start difficult conversations – because silence is how impunity reproduces

Some conversations are uncomfortable because they disrupt comforting myths:

  • The myth that a prestigious brand equals safety.
  • The myth that wealth equals oversight.
  • The myth that abuse would be obvious if it were real.
  • The myth that survivors could have prevented it ‘if they had just…’ done something differently.

These myths do enormous damage. They keep survivors trapped in self-doubt and give institutions cover to deny responsibility.

NOA pushes a different set of questions into public space: What structures allowed this? Who benefited from not knowing? Who had duties of care and failed them? Who used law, status, and intimidation to shut women up?

These are not abstract questions. They shape how survivors are treated right now. When institutions are given time, PR teams, and legal shielding, while survivors face scrutiny, risk, and disbelief, society sends a clear message: disclosure will cost you more than silence.

That message does not protect children. It does not protect workers. It protects abusers.

One of the clearest examples is redress controlled by the very institution implicated in the harm. Survivors are asked to trust processes where power still sits on the other side of the table – where compassion can mask containment, and accountability is optional. That dynamic is not healing. It is re-traumatising. And it teaches the next survivor that justice is conditional.

We do this so it will not happen to our children – because prevention is not a slogan

When we say “this must not happen again”, we are not speaking in abstractions. Prevention requires understanding how abuse actually unfolds – and where systems fail.

Abuse in powerful environments is rarely a single incident. It follows patterns. Patterns across time, locations, and victims are evidence – not coincidence.

Institutions can become part of the harm without committing it directly. Cover-ups, NDAs, internal silencing, intimidation, and failures to investigate are not passive mistakes. They create the conditions where abuse thrives.

And legality is not the same as justice. Systems can be technically lawful while structurally unfair – especially when cost, delay, and risk make justice inaccessible in practice.

Children inherit the world adults tolerate. If the lesson they absorb is that power protects itself and survivors carry the consequences, then impunity becomes normalised. If the lesson is that truth can surface, institutions can be compelled to change, and survivors are believed — then something shifts.

a blind lady justice stands with her sword by her side against a background of cracked glass
Home Affairs

When redress feels like re-trauma: a survivor’s view of the Harrods compensation scheme

by Shanta Sundarason
24 November 2025 - Updated on 11 December 2025

What we are demanding is not symbolic – it is practical

NOA’s work is anchored in concrete outcomes:

Recognition and investigation of trafficking indicators and networks. Where recruitment, coercive control, surveillance, and systematic exploitation are present, the response must examine the system – not isolate incidents.

A statutory public inquiry with the power to compel evidence. Without compulsory disclosure and testimony, the public receives fragments, not truth.

Equal access to justice for survivors of powerful perpetrators. Justice cannot exist only in theory. When cost, risk, and legal tactics deter claims, abuse is effectively protected.

Independent, trauma-informed redress. Independence is not a technicality. It is the difference between accountability and reputation management.

Why survivor-led work matters

Survivors understand blind spots because we have lived inside them. We know how self-blame is cultivated. We know how disbelief is delivered politely. We know how process can be weaponised to exhaust people into silence. We know what it means to be asked for proof while the institution holds the records.

Survivor-led does not mean anti-professional. It means priorities are not set by optics or convenience. It means the work is shaped by lived reality – and by what actually prevents harm: clarity, dignity, accountability, and courage.

This is the point: truth that protects

We are doing this because education prevents misrecognition. Awareness prevents denial. Conversation prevents isolation. Accountability prevents repetition.

And we are doing it because we reject the idea that exploitation is simply the cost of power – that some people can harm others and then disappear behind prestige, silence, and lawfare.

NOA is a collective record of truth – built by people systems tried to erase. We speak not because it is easy, but because it is necessary. We are doing this so that our children – and yours – inherit a world where harm is recognised early, investigated fully, and stopped; where institutions protect people instead of brands; and where the law applies to everyone.

Because no one is safe when anyone is above the law.

Friends of Bylines Network

There has never been a greater need for grassroots journalism that investigates the stories that really matter, holds power to account and champions the voices of everyday citizens. We are proudly powered by volunteers but what we do isn’t free.

STAND WITH US for independent, citizen-led journalism that makes democracy stronger, and you will even get some exclusive benefits.

BECOME A FRIEND
Tags: AdvocacyMental HealthTrafficking

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Shanta Sundarason

Shanta Sundarason

For over a decade, I have dedicated my life to supporting others in their pursuit of justice. Through my non-profit work, I have spoken out for truth and reconciliation, supported vulnerable and trafficked youth, and challenged systems of exploitation, including modern-day slave labour. In doing so, I have empowered hundreds of young people to become critical thinkers, change-makers, and advocates for justice. Now, for the first time in over thirty years, I am turning that same commitment inward. I am seeking justice for myself — not only to address my own harm, but to affirm that no one is beyond accountability.

Related Posts

Palestine Action protest
Opinion

The ban on Palestine Action: justice or hypocrisy?

by Patrick Wright
3 August 2026
20/07/2026. Keir Starmer gives his farewell speech outside 10 Downing Street
Opinion

Just because you keep saying it, doesn’t make it true

by Paul Rowlston
24 July 2026
black and white image of two children walking away from camera down a rural lane, one child has an arm around the shoulder of the second
Opinion

Whatever happened to empathy?

by John Heywood
11 July 2026 - Updated on 13 July 2026
a small child reaches up holding a yellow star, which also forms one of the yellow stars of the European flag
Brexit

European dreams versus reality

by Helmuth Porschen
30 June 2026
a French flag of vertical bands of blue, white and red lies below a poster for an Iranian rally in Paris. On top of these is the word ‘non’ in big red letters
Opinion

How Europe’s appeasement enables Iran’s transnational repression

by Laila Jazayeri
29 June 2026
Next Post
people walking in shallow estuary water off Spurn Point

From decline to recovery: seagrass returns to the Humber

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720