• Contact
  • About
  • Authors
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
Yorkshire Bylines
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
    emmanuel macron

    Does Macron’s loss of a parliamentary majority matter to us?

    Hanseatic League

    The Hanseatic League: continuing a long tradition of cultural exchange across Europe

    channel refugees

    Deporting migrants to Rwanda – another ill-conceived political stunt

    Johnson next to a coin

    The price of Putin

    The PM in a compromising position, by Stan

    Boris Johnson having sex in the office: a case of misconduct in public office?

    Sinn Fein NI Protocol Bill

    Is the future course of Brexit now in the hands of Sinn Féin?

    RAF Linton

    Is the Home Office planning more law breaking at Linton camp?

    Eton College

    The public cost of private schools: rising fees and luxury facilities raise questions about charitable status

    Johnson and Macron

    Mais oui, mon ami: Johnson and Macron display ‘le bromance’ and discuss a European Political Community

    Trending Tags

    • Johnson
    • Coronavirus
    • Labour
    • Starmer
    • Northern Ireland protocol
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • All
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
    Shipping forecast areas by felibrilu on Flikr

    Norky’s ramblings: quintessentially British

    Nostell Priory, Wakefield

    Glastonbury? What’s Glastonbury? When the music world came to Wakefield

    Headingley Cricket Stadium

    A view from the Roses match: is everything ‘rosey’ in English cricket?

    Bettys' Fat Rascals

    Scallywags, scoundrels and rascals abound in Yorkshire (we do like our scones)

    'Woke' beliefs

    Woke and proud: Compassion must never be allowed to go out of fashion

    Eurovision 2022 stage - photo by Michael Doherty on Wikimedia Commons licensed by CC BY-SA 4.0

    What does Ukraine’s Eurovision win tell us about the politics of solidarity?

    Red Ladder

    Climbing the Red Ladder – bringing theatre to the community

    Kaiser Chiefs in Doncaster

    Kaiser Chiefs never miss a beat in Doncaster

    Bradford Council leader Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, second from right, is joined by Keighley Creative representatives, from left, Georgina Webster, Jan Smithies and Gemma Hobbs.

    Bradford announced as City of Culture 2025

    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • All
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
    Johnson next to a coin

    The price of Putin

    Eton College

    The public cost of private schools: rising fees and luxury facilities raise questions about charitable status

    Freya Osment from Northern Gas Networks

    International Women in Engineering Day 2022

    Rail strikes

    Millions affected by biggest rail strike action in 30 years

    conservative party

    The Conservative Party: fiscally irresponsible and ideologically incapable of addressing the current crises

    Yorkshire cows

    British farmers are being offered a lump sum payment to leave the industry – but at what cost to agriculture?

    cost-of-living-crisis-in-voluntary-sector

    Cost-of-living crisis looming for the voluntary sector

    Money on the floor - £20 notes

    The huge cost of Brexit is being seriously understated

    Financial problems

    Surge in bad debt and late payments indicate mounting business distress in Yorkshire

    Trending Tags

      • Economy
      • Technology
      • Trade
    • Region
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • News
      • All
      • Brexit
      • Education
      • Environment
      • Health
      • Home Affairs
      • Transport
      • World
      emmanuel macron

      Does Macron’s loss of a parliamentary majority matter to us?

      Hanseatic League

      The Hanseatic League: continuing a long tradition of cultural exchange across Europe

      channel refugees

      Deporting migrants to Rwanda – another ill-conceived political stunt

      Johnson next to a coin

      The price of Putin

      The PM in a compromising position, by Stan

      Boris Johnson having sex in the office: a case of misconduct in public office?

      Sinn Fein NI Protocol Bill

      Is the future course of Brexit now in the hands of Sinn Féin?

      RAF Linton

      Is the Home Office planning more law breaking at Linton camp?

      Eton College

      The public cost of private schools: rising fees and luxury facilities raise questions about charitable status

      Johnson and Macron

      Mais oui, mon ami: Johnson and Macron display ‘le bromance’ and discuss a European Political Community

      Trending Tags

      • Johnson
      • Coronavirus
      • Labour
      • Starmer
      • Northern Ireland protocol
      • Brexit
      • Culture
      • Education
      • Environment
      • Home Affairs
      • Transport
      • World
    • Politics
    • Opinion
    • Lifestyle
      • All
      • Culture
      • Dance
      • Food
      • Music
      • Poetry
      • Recipes
      • Sport
      Shipping forecast areas by felibrilu on Flikr

      Norky’s ramblings: quintessentially British

      Nostell Priory, Wakefield

      Glastonbury? What’s Glastonbury? When the music world came to Wakefield

      Headingley Cricket Stadium

      A view from the Roses match: is everything ‘rosey’ in English cricket?

      Bettys' Fat Rascals

      Scallywags, scoundrels and rascals abound in Yorkshire (we do like our scones)

      'Woke' beliefs

      Woke and proud: Compassion must never be allowed to go out of fashion

      Eurovision 2022 stage - photo by Michael Doherty on Wikimedia Commons licensed by CC BY-SA 4.0

      What does Ukraine’s Eurovision win tell us about the politics of solidarity?

      Red Ladder

      Climbing the Red Ladder – bringing theatre to the community

      Kaiser Chiefs in Doncaster

      Kaiser Chiefs never miss a beat in Doncaster

      Bradford Council leader Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, second from right, is joined by Keighley Creative representatives, from left, Georgina Webster, Jan Smithies and Gemma Hobbs.

      Bradford announced as City of Culture 2025

      • Food
      • Music
      • Poetry
      • Sport
    • Business
      • All
      • Economy
      • Technology
      • Trade
      Johnson next to a coin

      The price of Putin

      Eton College

      The public cost of private schools: rising fees and luxury facilities raise questions about charitable status

      Freya Osment from Northern Gas Networks

      International Women in Engineering Day 2022

      Rail strikes

      Millions affected by biggest rail strike action in 30 years

      conservative party

      The Conservative Party: fiscally irresponsible and ideologically incapable of addressing the current crises

      Yorkshire cows

      British farmers are being offered a lump sum payment to leave the industry – but at what cost to agriculture?

      cost-of-living-crisis-in-voluntary-sector

      Cost-of-living crisis looming for the voluntary sector

      Money on the floor - £20 notes

      The huge cost of Brexit is being seriously understated

      Financial problems

      Surge in bad debt and late payments indicate mounting business distress in Yorkshire

      Trending Tags

        • Economy
        • Technology
        • Trade
      • Region
      No Result
      View All Result
      Yorkshire Bylines
      No Result
      View All Result
      Home News Environment

      “The GMO lobbyist will see you now, minister”

      The UK is under immense pressure to sign up to US demands on the regulations applying to GMO (genetically modified organisms), as part of the US-UK trade deal. One look at the USA’s commercial commitment to GMO tells you why.

      Martin BrooksbyMartin Brooks
      01-08-2020 19:51
      in Environment, Politics, Technology, World
      Photo: Dreamstime

      Photo: Dreamstime, purchased by author

      9
      VIEWS
      Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
      ADVERTISEMENT

      The UK is under immense pressure to sign up to US demands on the regulations applying to GMO (genetically modified organisms), as part of the US-UK trade deal. One look at the USA’s commercial commitment to GMO tells you why.

      GMO technology, often developed by US companies, is embedded in US farming practices and hence the food chain. In 1997, 17 per cent of US soybean crops were modified to be “herbicide tolerant”. By 2014, the figure reached 94 per cent where it has stayed ever since. The two other major crops, corn and cotton, today stand at 94 per cent and 92 per cent respectively.

      The yield per acre for corn grown in the US is now three and a half times greater than it was in the mid-1950s. Much of this gain is attributable to genetic modification. A 2014 analysis concluded that applied GM technology had reduced chemical pesticide use by 37 per cent, increased crop yields by 22 per cent, and increased farmer profits by 68 per cent. In isolation, the commercial case for GMO is compelling.

      Most products that are modified are ‘stacked GMOs’ containing both herbicide-tolerant and insecticide-resistant modifications. Increasing numbers of other traits such as pest or drought resistance, crop height or blight resistance are being added through genetic modification to improve the yield. It is estimated that 75 per cent of US processed foods now contain ingredients produced from GMOs.

      The US farming industry has wholeheartedly embraced GMO, though the US public appears to be more circumspect, with 39 per cent of them wanting GM foodstuffs to be labelled. GMO technology is so well established in US farming that the industry has left public opinion in its wake. Any industry concession on a food-labelling requirement for GMO content in the US is unlikely.

      The widespread adoption of GMOs by US farmers is also a commercial problem. The scope for US sales growth reduces in the US market as GMO use approaches saturation. So while the almost monopoly position of GMO has to be protected in the US, the efforts of US lobbyists and diplomats now turns to international markets. The EU has been the recipient of such lobbying attention for a long time, in spite of, or maybe because of, its citizens’ basic resistance to GMO. In this regard, voter concerns in the UK are broadly in line with the rest of the EU.

      In the EU only Spain and Portugal are significant growers of GM crops. When last invited to declare their wish to grow GM crops, 19 of the EU members states from 27 opted out. Interestingly, the UK was then a member state. England wished to have the option, but Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales opted out.

      While the EU is not a grower there are 60 GM products in the EU marketplace with animal feeds being a large component of those products. GMO and pesticide use run hand in hand and in any rigorous analysis the impact of GMO and associated pesticides should not be divorced from one another.


      More articles from Yorkshire Bylines:

      • Have you heard about Ractopamine in animal production?
      • The brutal truth about farming standards
      • Chlorinated chicken is just the tip of the iceberg

      Some scientific experts in the agritech world are frustrated at the way GMO technology has been demonised as inevitably a ‘bad thing’. They argue that Darwinian evolution of all species (random mutations) and the human intervention in breeding plants both produce genetic modification. As populations expand and pressure on limited farmland increases, many see GMO as the only way to meet the rapidly increasing global food demand. Equally, it is important that the demand for more food globally, and the commercial opportunity it represents, do not overlook any detrimental effects on humans or on the environment caused by large-scale GMO food production.

      Any suggestion that GM food has a directly detrimental effect on human beings, or any other averse effect, is heavily contested by those with vested interests. A combination of strategies is used, including direct lobbying, discrediting the science (any science suggesting GMO are a problem) and marshalling PR and propaganda campaigns.

      There’s a fundamental difference in attitude between the US and the EU regarding the safety of farming practices. In the US, the first priority is to commercially exploit new products in the market place. Regulations, and attitudes to risk, are typically less constraining than in the EU. Statutory US safety requirements are respected, but the regulations tend to offer a lower threshold for approval than their EU counterparts require.

      The prevailing scientific view is that no GMO technology should be subject to blanket regulatory rejection; rather, that approvals should be considered on a case-by-case basis, looking at the particular application of a specific technology. It is simultaneously being argued by supporters that certain GMO technologies are substantially the same as natural gene-modification processes and should be exempt from regulatory approval altogether. One such technology is the so-called “precision breeding techniques”.

      As the agriculture bill makes its way through committee scrutiny and the House of Lords, procedural and technical questions arise about an amendment being proposed. The amendment was originally proposed by York Outer MP Julian Sturdy and was put forward by crossbench peer Lord Cameron of Dillington and others. The effect of the proposed amendment will be to absolve “precision breeding techniques” from any regulatory scrutiny in the UK on the grounds the “nucleic acid changes could have occurred naturally or through traditional breeding practices”.

      There are further questions: If the loosely defined precision breeding techniques are made exempt from regulation on the grounds they are the same thing as naturally occurring modifications or traditional breeding techniques, should they not also be denied patent protection? If they are denied patent protection should they not be treated similarly to naturally modified products, meaning farmers cannot be compelled to repurchase the seeds for the GMOs every year. Also, including the word ‘precision’ to describe the genetic modification process is a seductive label. It cannot be assumed that scientists can precisely predict the impact of a genetic modification when introduced in industrial-scale farming, just because the modification itself is ‘precise’. Making any GMO completely free of regulation is dangerous when so often there are unknown and unintended consequences of a technique moved from the lab to extensive deployment in the real world.

      GMO Crops by ☼☼Jo Zimny Photos☼☼ is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

      Corporations have a history of getting products through regulatory hurdles and then concealing detrimental effects of those products that are already known about or subsequently arise. Once corporate fortunes are heavily dependent on the products already in the marketplace, the tendency is to hide the inconvenient truth, or deny it, and spend a lot of money persuading the public that everything is fine. The Philip Morris example of prolonged corporate deceit about the known link between smoking and cancer has become a classic model of US corporate malpractice. Europe is not without its equivalent scandals: VW’s gerrymandering of exhaust emissions under official test conditions being a recent one. Removing regulatory hurdles altogether just invites further cover-ups.

      In contrast to the US culture, EU regulation generally adopts the ‘precautionary principle’ where the onus is on the GMO developers and seed suppliers to demonstrate that they have identified all foreseeable safety considerations. Until potentially adverse consequences have been resolved, approval is withheld or restrictions imposed on the product’s use. This is a huge irritation to the US and the current US president in particular. Critics of GMOs say that the EU is as subject to the commercial power and funding of the lobbyists as the US is, and we are being taken down the same road. Now outside of the EU, and in desperate need of striking a trade deal, the UK is a sitting duck whose wings and legs have been removed by the genetically engineered nationalistic delusion of “taking back control.”

      The implications of GMO use go beyond food safety concerns for human consumption of GM foods. Those involved in applying herbicides and insecticides to GMO crops are exposed to toxic chemicals as part of the industrial-scale farming process, as are nearby people affected by drift. The effect on animals reared on GM feedstock is another potential hazard. The creation of millions of acres of mono-cultural GMO crops that are weed and insect free undermines species and habitat diversity and so plays havoc with the food chain. Hence GMO technology, intended to improve our food security, can inadvertently pose a threat to it. There are also concerns that cross pollination from GMOs with unintended target plants and weeds can produce weeds with robust resistances that inure them to herbicides over time. The phenomenon is called ‘lifting’ – in which applied spray rises as a cloud and drifts off to settle somewhere it was not intended to be, with unpredictable effects on the flora and fauna whose genes are altered or whose habitat is changed.

      A further commercial issue is the ability of the seed suppliers (often the same companies that supply the agrichemicals), to assert intellectual property (IP) rights over farmers. It arises because gene modification enables the large agrichemical companies to patent the resulting seeds and in turn dictate the use of modified seeds. In the US, this ethical issue of whether manipulation of naturally occurring genes should qualify for IP protection, is less important than the commercial opportunity to be exploited. Currently, farmers can be compelled under their commercial contracts to buy their seeds for future crops from the agrichemical companies. There is a cosy relationship between manufacturers, regulators and politicians, with little opposition to this state of affairs apart from environment campaign groups and their lobbyists, who don’t have anything like the funding available to make their case.


      More articles from Martin Brooks:

      • New Immigration Bill is Priti poor
      • Watch out for Boris Johnson’s imminent Churchill impersonation

      The jury is still out on the extent to which GMOs harm people, wildlife and the environment. There might not even be a jury if the US succeeds in establishing commercial tribunals in the trade deal. These operate outside of national legal jurisdictions, where corporations can claim future loss of profits due to actions by national governments and reclaim the predicted loss if the tribunal of commercial lawyers decides for the corporate plaintiff.

      The network of pro-GMO advocates includes lobbyists, diplomats, regulators, industry-funded scientists and politicians. Their collective lobbying practices are interconnected, sophisticated and well funded. Known lobbying spend by Monsanto in the EU is $1.8m per year. They are highly active in the US, EU and now the UK. They operate as a consortium rather than rivals. Many of the key players move frequently between industry, regulatory bodies and academic posts so they know how the lobbying game works. They have comprehensively infiltrated regulatory decision making in the US and the EU. The lobbying organisations appear in their own right or hiding behind lobbying groups that they fund. In the US and the EU, Monsanto and Syngenta are big players with big budgets. Attempts have been made by the EU to filter out industry insiders from sitting directly in positions where they can influence policy. Their long-term strategy however means vested interests continue to erode or compromise EU regulation. The EU’s precautionary principle for GMOs is under attack and hanging on by its fingernails. The UK’s attachment to this principle is suspect or, to be exact, England’s attachment is. 

      The English having declared an openness to GMO, the UK may be seen by the US an easy door to push open. Without pressure from the public to express opposition to US trade conditions on GMO, the government is likely to cave in. We all need to tell our MPs and make it clear to government we are watching their every move and will not accept conditions laid down by the negotiators on the US side. Otherwise, the UK won’t have much say and the US requirements for acceptance and deregulation of GMO products will be locked in to the UK market indefinitely. Negotiation will not even be a recognisable part of the process. Left to its own devices, the US will reject labelling. The commercial ethics around patenting, the unresolved safety issues or the environmental threats of GMO are unlikely to get a look-in. If you don’t want the US to call the shots on GMOs make sure your MP and the government know you understand the issues and that you do not want a regulatory-free zone in the UK.

      Tags: Farming
      ADVERTISEMENT
      Previous Post

      A Britain of two nations

      Next Post

      The government is in danger of being overwhelmed by Brexit

      Martin Brooks

      Martin Brooks

      Martin spent his early working life in Europe, Australia and the US as a consultant loss prevention engineer. He founded two businesses enabling organisations to cultivate their innovation expertise, focusing particularly on the creative and collaborative aspects of cultures conducive to innovation. He is alert to vested interests and politicians who claim to know what’s best for us while preventing public scrutiny of their actions. He lives in York.

      Related Posts

      emmanuel macron
      World

      Does Macron’s loss of a parliamentary majority matter to us?

      byTony McCobb
      3 July 2022
      Hanseatic League
      Region

      The Hanseatic League: continuing a long tradition of cultural exchange across Europe

      byHamish Stewart
      3 July 2022
      channel refugees
      Home Affairs

      Deporting migrants to Rwanda – another ill-conceived political stunt

      byAndrew Milroy
      1 July 2022
      Johnson next to a coin
      Economy

      The price of Putin

      byAndy Brown
      1 July 2022
      The PM in a compromising position, by Stan
      Home Affairs

      Boris Johnson having sex in the office: a case of misconduct in public office?

      byHelen Davidson
      30 June 2022
      Next Post
      Wave attribution not required Unknown author / CC0

      The government is in danger of being overwhelmed by Brexit

      Want to support us?

      Can you help Yorkshire Bylines to grow and become more sustainable with a regular donation, no matter how small?  

      DONATE

      Sign up to our newsletter

      If you would like to receive the Yorkshire Bylines regular newsletter, straight talking direct to your inbox, click the button below.

      NEWSLETTER

      LATEST

      emmanuel macron

      Does Macron’s loss of a parliamentary majority matter to us?

      3 July 2022
      Hanseatic League

      The Hanseatic League: continuing a long tradition of cultural exchange across Europe

      3 July 2022
      Shipping forecast areas by felibrilu on Flikr

      Norky’s ramblings: quintessentially British

      2 July 2022
      channel refugees

      Deporting migrants to Rwanda – another ill-conceived political stunt

      1 July 2022

      MOST READ

      The PM in a compromising position, by Stan

      Boris Johnson having sex in the office: a case of misconduct in public office?

      30 June 2022
      Photo credit Robert Sharp / englishpenLicensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

      The Davis Downside Dossier

      1 July 2022
      Prime minister PMQ prep

      Brexit isn’t working – something we can all agree on

      28 June 2022
      Shipping forecast areas by felibrilu on Flikr

      Norky’s ramblings: quintessentially British

      2 July 2022

      BROWSE BY TAGS

      antivaxxers Charity Climate change Coronavirus Cost of living Creative industries Crime Cummings Democracy Devolution Equality Farming Fishing History Immigration Johnson Journalism Labour Mental health NHS Northern Ireland protocol Pollution Poverty PPE Starmer Travel Ukraine
      Yorkshire Bylines

      Yorkshire Bylines is a regional online newspaper that supports citizen journalism. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

      Learn more about us

      No Result
      View All Result
      • Contact
      • About
      • Letters
      • Donate
      • Privacy
      • Bylines network
      • Shop

      © 2022 Yorkshire Bylines. Citizen Journalism | Local & Internationalist

      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • News
        • Brexit
        • Education
        • Environment
        • Health
        • Home Affairs
        • Transport
        • World
      • Politics
      • Opinion
      • Lifestyle
        • Culture
        • Dance
        • Food
        • Music
        • Poetry
        • Recipes
        • Sport
      • Business
        • Economy
        • Technology
        • Trade
      • Donate
      • The Compendium of Cabinet Codebreakers
      • The Davis Downside Dossier
      • The Digby Jones Index
      • Newsletter sign up
      • Cartoons by Stan
      • Authors

      © 2022 Yorkshire Bylines. Citizen Journalism | Local & Internationalist

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below

      Forgotten Password?

      Retrieve your password

      Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

      Log In