• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home News Brexit

Daniel Hannan: Britain’s misleader-in-chief?

Misleading people as only he can doesn’t come cheap after all. He is a fitting replacement for Johnson

Anthony Robinson by Anthony Robinson
11-05-2020 12:39 - Updated on 28-08-2024 16:01
in Brexit, Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)

Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)

Share on Bluesky

Daniel Hannan is not a man you would necessarily trust to give you the truth about anything. He is on record in 2016 saying that, “absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market”; since when, he himself never stops telling us that’s precisely what we should do.

The former MEP and first director of the ERG as a 22-year-old graduate in 1993, writes an expensive column for The Telegraph. Misleading people as only he can doesn’t come cheap after all. He is a fitting replacement for Johnson.

Last Sunday he told his readers on Brexit, “The country as a whole, though, has moved on. By 48 per cent to 40, we now say that Britain was right to leave the European Union. Plenty of Remainers have reconciled themselves to the result, and you can see why.”

This puzzled me because I have carefully followed the regular polling of YouGov asking if the UK was right or wrong to vote to leave the EU since the polling started in August 2016. In the 86 polls from mid-January 2018 to February this year, not a single poll had ‘right’ ahead. The polls appeared to stop on February 10, but at that time ‘wrong’ was well in the lead.

On the WhatUKthinks.org website, I was surprised to see two new surveys have been added. One, by Number Cruncher Polls with a sample size of 1,010 and fieldwork from 24–26 March, does indeed show the figures Hannan mentioned.

But it is a total outlier as you can see in the chart below:

The Times, who have funded nearly all the 142 polls on the WhatUKthinks polling series, must have seen the Number Cruncher figures and decided to check by asking YouGov to run another poll which they did on 16–17 April. This one had nearly twice the sample size and showed that ‘wrong’ was still in the lead, albeit by one percentage point.

Both figures were I assume available to Hannan when he wrote his column, as were all the other 86 poll results showing a majority thought the decision to leave was wrong, going back more than two years. He picked the one figure from an obscure pollster that seemed to support his argument. Was it a lie? No, not in the strict sense, it wasn’t. But was it an accurate picture? That’s up to you. It was certainly very selective.

Professor John Curtice gives his take on recent polling and concludes that the evidence does show a slight increase in support for Brexit but, “whether as a result a majority now think that the decision to leave was the right one is far from clear. All that we can say with any certainty is that Britain still looks more or less evenly divided on the issue, much as it did before Brexit Day.”

In other words very little has changed.

Hannan also said on Sunday that all Britain wants from the EU is “the sort of basic, low-fat trade deal Brussels has with Canada or South Korea. There are no complicated details, no difficult technicalities”.

CETA, the Canadian deal, is 1,598 pages. The South Korean deal 1,432 pages.

So, no problems there then.

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Anthony Robinson

Anthony Robinson

Anthony is a retired sales engineer, living in North Yorkshire. He has represented several European manufacturers of packaging machinery in the UK. Anthony is interested in politics, although not as an active member of any party, and enjoys reading, gardening and DIY. Follow him on Bluesky

Related Posts

Cricket player batsman hitting a ball with a bat shot from below with cricket stadium ground background
Opinion

How has Hawk-Eye changed the game of cricket?

by Dr John Elsom
10 September 2026
Palestine Action protest
Opinion

The ban on Palestine Action: justice or hypocrisy?

by Patrick Wright
3 August 2026
20/07/2026. Keir Starmer gives his farewell speech outside 10 Downing Street
Opinion

Just because you keep saying it, doesn’t make it true

by Paul Rowlston
24 July 2026
black and white image of two children walking away from camera down a rural lane, one child has an arm around the shoulder of the second
Opinion

Whatever happened to empathy?

by John Heywood
11 July 2026 - Updated on 13 July 2026
a small child reaches up holding a yellow star, which also forms one of the yellow stars of the European flag
Brexit

European dreams versus reality

by Helmuth Porschen
30 June 2026
Next Post
Clem Onojeghuo clemono2 / CC0

Construction workers are risking their lives for buildings we may no longer need

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720