• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9720
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Yorkshire Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Culture
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
Yorkshire Bylines
Home News Brexit

Buckle up for the end of mandatory seatbelt usage?

Louisa Merrick-White explains how Brexit and the government’s retained EU law bill is threatening the country’s road safety practices

Louisa Merrick-White by Louisa Merrick-White
31-01-2023 16:07 - Updated on 08-09-2025 13:47
in Brexit, Home Affairs
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
retained-EU-law-bill

Image via Pxhere, in the public domain

Share on Bluesky

This January marks 40 years since mandatory seatbelt laws were introduced in the UK, spearheaded by leading accident prevention charity, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA). To celebrate, the government is taking steps which will potentially scale back the lifesaving legislation as part of its retained EU law (revocation and reform) bill (REUL).

According to the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS), once the 1983 legislation was introduced:

  • 90% of drivers and front seat passengers were observed to be wearing a seatbelt;
  • there was a 29% reduction in fatal injuries for front seat passengers; and
  • there was a 30% drop in serious injuries reported across 1983.

RoSPA estimates that this seatbelt legislation has saved tens of thousands of lives since it was introduced. So why is it now under threat?

What is REUL?

Since the UK left the European Union, the government has been fighting to untangle the country’s legislation from that of the EU’s. Retained EU law is EU-derived legislation that has remained in our domestic legal framework since Brexit. The REUL bill will allow the government to review and then amend or revoke retained EU laws.

However, thanks to a so-called ‘sunset clause’, any EU law that the government wants to keep and incorporate into UK law, must be done by the end of the year. After that, any laws not explicitly retained will automatically be revoked. The REUL bill has understandably been widely criticised and the innumerable issues such as timescale, the rights and protections that may be lost and the impact on workers and businesses, are well publicised.

distressed result UK-EU
Brexit

Is the retained EU law (revocation and reform) bill another nail in the UK’s coffin?

by Dr Stella Perrott
28 November 2022 - Updated on 8 September 2025

Seatbelts vs sunset clause

RoSPA fears that some legislation related to mandatory seatbelt use will become one of thousands of laws to fall victim to the sunset clause. While seatbelt use itself is featured in the Road Safety Act, which will be unaffected, RoSPA fears that REUL will water down the existing laws, making some of the who, what, where and whens of seatbelt use less clear.

According to PACTS, wearing a seatbelt can halve your chances of dying in a collision and 30% of those who died in cars in 2021 had failed to wear one. 

One REUL for one and one for another

Government statistics suggest that while fatalities have plateaued, the number of people killed while not wearing a seatbelt has risen, suggesting that compliance with current seatbelt laws is falling. This is likely to be connected to the reduction in the number of traffic officers over the last 12 years, which the Police Federation attribute to the increased number of road deaths. But if the details around compliance and enforcement of seatbelt use are also watered down, RoSPA fears fatalities will continue to increase.  

Interestingly, Rishi Sunak was caught not wearing his seatbelt just a couple of weeks ago and was subsequently fined by Lancashire Police. This arguably raises the question, was this just a momentary lapse of judgement by the PM, or does it show a fundamental disregard for road safety laws? Are these some of the pesky EU regulations the government intends to do away with?

A backwards step

RoSPA is understandably concerned that the momentous changes it campaigned for over four decades ago are now under threat and lives are being put at risk.

Nathan Davies, head of policy at RoSPA, said on the issue:

“Wearing a seatbelt is not just ‘common sense’. Making seatbelts a legal requirement changed behaviour, and drove up usage by 55 per cent almost immediately. But recent Department for Transport data shows us that compliance is the lowest it has ever been since the law was introduced, and that means that people still need laws which reinforce the importance for them and the other occupants of vehicles. By removing seatbelt laws, we expect usage to fall, and fatalities will then inevitably increase.

“Throwing vital seatbelt laws in the air at a time they are most needed will set the stage for thousands of the public being killed and injured on the road, leaving behind loved ones, friends and family. We must not throw away the progress made over last 40 years of mandatory seatbelt usage and urge the Government to tackle these vital laws with the time, respect and attention they deserve.”

The retained EU law (revocation and reform) bill 2022 will have a second reading in the Lords on 6 February. Only time will tell whether laws around seatbelt use will ride off into the sunset on the back of Brexit at the end of this year.

    Great read!  Let me buy you a coffee.
Tags: DemocracyRetained EU Law

Sign up for the Yorkshire Bylines newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Louisa Merrick-White

Louisa Merrick-White

Louisa is a freelance writer and editor from Sheffield. After graduating from the University of Sheffield she rediscovered her passion for writing and has since written for Metro, Huffpost and the Independent. Louisa is also an Assistant Editor for the Bylines Network and enjoys writing on her blog when she can find the time!

Related Posts

Drone photograph showing the very low water levels in Scar House Reservoir during the 2025 heatwave and drought. Months of below average rainfall have left the reservoirs looking very dry
Environment

Will there be enough water to satisfy demand in 2050? Part two

by Patrick Wright
9 September 2026
Aerial view of a dramatically low Woodhead Reservoir during drought conditions, The reservoir, part of a system supplying drinking water to Greater Manchester, lies in North Derbyshire, June 2025
Environment

Will there be enough water to satisfy demand in 2050? Part one

by Patrick Wright
8 September 2026 - Updated on 9 September 2026
Montage of photos showing construction sites of a new road, railway a wind farm overlaid by a map showing the regions of England
Economy

Why regional governance could deliver greater prosperity

by John Hall
29 July 2026
Row of small Victorian houses in Halifax with a factory chimney behind them
Home Affairs

The root of the anger: Why post-industrial towns blame the wrong scapegoat

by John Heywood
28 July 2026
Red dome tent pitched on a concrete sidewalk beside a dark brick building, with scattered tarps and clothing nearby - this is the site of a rough sleepers’ encampment in Bradford 2026
Home Affairs

HOP wins coveted gold award despite Magistrates’ Court encampment

by Christianah Lumsden
9 July 2026 - Updated on 12 July 2026
Next Post
Regulations

Sick and tired of all those pesky regulations

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Art Books Boris Johnson Bradford Charity Climate Change Cost of Living Covid-19 Creative Industries Crime Democracy Devolution Donald Trump Environment Equality Experience Farming Festival Gaza Conflict General Election History Human Rights Immigration Iran Journalism Keir Starmer Labour Leeds Media Mental Health NHS Northern Ireland Protocol Pollution Poverty Recipe Refugees and Asylum Seekers Restaurants Retained EU Law Review Rishi Sunak Sheffield Theatre Travel Ukraine USA
Yorkshire Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Yorkshire and beyond.

Yorkshire Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Society
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Recipes
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Science and Technology
    • Trade
  • Region
  • The Davis Downside Dossier
  • The Digby Jones Index
  • Cartoons by Stan
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Yorkshire Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9720